The language of action “construes meaning” not in a situation of observation, but precisely insofar as it informs action in the transaction process that develops between two agents. For this reason the interplay of question and answer in which the concepts of intuition and reflection take on meaning, is not where protocols are expressed. But analysing ordinary language reveals that languages “construe meaning”, even without constatation and without entailing verification There is, therefore, “sense”, not only in constatation, but also in all illocutionary acts, just as there is illocution in a constatation.
Speaking the language
DE LEO, DANIELA
2012-01-01
Abstract
The language of action “construes meaning” not in a situation of observation, but precisely insofar as it informs action in the transaction process that develops between two agents. For this reason the interplay of question and answer in which the concepts of intuition and reflection take on meaning, is not where protocols are expressed. But analysing ordinary language reveals that languages “construe meaning”, even without constatation and without entailing verification There is, therefore, “sense”, not only in constatation, but also in all illocutionary acts, just as there is illocution in a constatation.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
