This essay highlights the ambivalence of social class and considers it as an exemplification of modernity. The presentation of the class analysis carried out by classical sociology, with particular references to Karl Marx and Max Weber, introduces the discussion of contemporary theories that have valued the ambivalence of the class to observe the socioeconomic changes in the transition from Fordism to post-Fordism. Stuhart Hall and Zygmunt Bauman are discussed as authors who emphasize the importance of cultural processes and actualize the heuristic potential of classical sociology and its categories. This essay ends by underlining how the ambivalence of the social class offers interesting insights into social criticism.
Ambivalenze di classe nella teoria sociologica
Bevilacqua, Emiliano
2021-01-01
Abstract
This essay highlights the ambivalence of social class and considers it as an exemplification of modernity. The presentation of the class analysis carried out by classical sociology, with particular references to Karl Marx and Max Weber, introduces the discussion of contemporary theories that have valued the ambivalence of the class to observe the socioeconomic changes in the transition from Fordism to post-Fordism. Stuhart Hall and Zygmunt Bauman are discussed as authors who emphasize the importance of cultural processes and actualize the heuristic potential of classical sociology and its categories. This essay ends by underlining how the ambivalence of the social class offers interesting insights into social criticism.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
AMBIVALENZE DI CLASSE NELLA TEORIA SOCIOLOGICA.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
317.7 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
317.7 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.