This paper investigates the gender promotion gap in a particular highly skilled profession, that of physicians. The following analyses are based on a dataset of more than a thousand doctors working in Italy, a country in which hospitals play a central role in the national health care system. Given a three-step career ladder—first level, vice, and head—this research finds that women are 8% less likely than men to be promoted from the first level to vice, whereas no significant disadvantage is found in the promotion from vice to head. This suggests that the vertical segregation is due more to a sticky floors mechanism than to a glass ceiling effect. Moreover, no motherhood penalty occurs. Private organizations appear to be more gender equal than public ones and similar, albeit weaker, findings come from the analysis of the specialties, cautiously suggesting that the male-dominated area of surgery is more gender equal than the female-dominated area of medicine. These findings point out that women in highly skilled professions may encounter fewer obstacles to promotion than in the general labor market. Furthermore, they may encounter fewer obstacles within the most competitive organizations and specialty areas than across the profession in general. This is not, however, because of a greater number of opportunities, but because they represent a highly selected and career-oriented population. These results shed light on the costs of such achievement for women, both in terms of effort and in terms of equality among women themselves.
Highly skilled women reaching the top: a cost-free achievement? Analyzing the gender promotion gap in the medical profession
Gaiaschi, Camilla
2021-01-01
Abstract
This paper investigates the gender promotion gap in a particular highly skilled profession, that of physicians. The following analyses are based on a dataset of more than a thousand doctors working in Italy, a country in which hospitals play a central role in the national health care system. Given a three-step career ladder—first level, vice, and head—this research finds that women are 8% less likely than men to be promoted from the first level to vice, whereas no significant disadvantage is found in the promotion from vice to head. This suggests that the vertical segregation is due more to a sticky floors mechanism than to a glass ceiling effect. Moreover, no motherhood penalty occurs. Private organizations appear to be more gender equal than public ones and similar, albeit weaker, findings come from the analysis of the specialties, cautiously suggesting that the male-dominated area of surgery is more gender equal than the female-dominated area of medicine. These findings point out that women in highly skilled professions may encounter fewer obstacles to promotion than in the general labor market. Furthermore, they may encounter fewer obstacles within the most competitive organizations and specialty areas than across the profession in general. This is not, however, because of a greater number of opportunities, but because they represent a highly selected and career-oriented population. These results shed light on the costs of such achievement for women, both in terms of effort and in terms of equality among women themselves.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
soab026.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
1.59 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.59 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
|
Gaiaschi_Social Forces 2021_Accepted Manuscript.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Post-print referato (Refereed author’s manuscript)
Note: This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in
Social Forces following peer review. The version of record Gaiaschi, C. (2021). Highly skilled
women reaching the top: A cost-free achievement? Analyzing the gender promotion gap in
the medical profession. Social Forces, 100(2), 622-648 is available online at :
https://academic.oup.com/sf/article-abstract/100/2/622/6237427
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soab026
Licenza:
PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione
648.25 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
648.25 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


