This contribution aims to reflect the lack of attention in the linguistic use of the term sorority. A terminological absence denotes a symbolic absence, an absence of signification of the dimension of a feminine singularity/plurality. To re-evaluate this dimension, it is necessary to bring to analysis its constitutive structures, the Erlebnisse, and to find in them which characterises it in community, entropy. To re-establish the dialogical position of sorority and fraternity within dual anthropology.
Antropologia duale: io sono, io posso, io dono
D. De Leo
2023-01-01
Abstract
This contribution aims to reflect the lack of attention in the linguistic use of the term sorority. A terminological absence denotes a symbolic absence, an absence of signification of the dimension of a feminine singularity/plurality. To re-evaluate this dimension, it is necessary to bring to analysis its constitutive structures, the Erlebnisse, and to find in them which characterises it in community, entropy. To re-establish the dialogical position of sorority and fraternity within dual anthropology.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
De Leo Fraternità Sororità.pdf
non disponibili
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
324.89 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
324.89 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.