In decision science, when multiple alternative solutions exist, Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) provides decision-makers with systematic methods to select the optimal solution. Implementing MCDM requires evaluating various criteria to choose the best alternative. A key challenge in MCDM is identifying the principal criteria for evaluating alternatives, which typically necessitates an in-depth Systematic Literature Review (SLR), expert knowledge, brainstorming sessions, or a combination of these methods. This article proposes a solution for criteria identification through SLR. Reviewing literature manually to determine the most suitable criteria is time-consuming, as decision criteria are rarely mentioned in abstracts, requiring full-article reviews. As a result, manually extracting criteria from a large volume of articles is both labor-intensive and sometimes inefficient. This study proposes leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) including Llama Cloud, RAG Ollama and Gemini 2.5. The study aims at automate criteria extraction from peer-reviewed articles, enhancing efficiency, accuracy, and scalability in decision science. The proposed solution is tested in the energy supply chain, a critical infrastructure domain where decisionmaking is increasingly complex. The results of 3 LLM models are compared with traditional manual SLR results to assess capability, reliability and effectiveness. Our findings highlight LLMs as a novel tool in decision science and operations management for criteria identification, introducing an AI-enabled Decision Support System. The main contributions of this approach are: 1) Enhancing accuracy by systematically identifying decision criteria, 2) Handling multidisciplinary complexity by extracting insights across diverse documents, 3) Saving time and resources by reducing the need for full-article manual reviews. Future research will extend this methodology to other critical domains. We aim to develop a standardized criteria catalog for Critical Infrastructures (CIs) using this technology, create a smart data model, and contribute to global collaborative initiatives led by FIWARE Foundation, TM Forum, IUDX, and OASC. Our next step will focus on prompt engineering for optimized criteria selection.
AI-enabled Criteria Extraction for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Using Large Language Models
Aghazadeh Ardebili A.;Rucco C.;Saad M.;Longo Antonella.
2025-01-01
Abstract
In decision science, when multiple alternative solutions exist, Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) provides decision-makers with systematic methods to select the optimal solution. Implementing MCDM requires evaluating various criteria to choose the best alternative. A key challenge in MCDM is identifying the principal criteria for evaluating alternatives, which typically necessitates an in-depth Systematic Literature Review (SLR), expert knowledge, brainstorming sessions, or a combination of these methods. This article proposes a solution for criteria identification through SLR. Reviewing literature manually to determine the most suitable criteria is time-consuming, as decision criteria are rarely mentioned in abstracts, requiring full-article reviews. As a result, manually extracting criteria from a large volume of articles is both labor-intensive and sometimes inefficient. This study proposes leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) including Llama Cloud, RAG Ollama and Gemini 2.5. The study aims at automate criteria extraction from peer-reviewed articles, enhancing efficiency, accuracy, and scalability in decision science. The proposed solution is tested in the energy supply chain, a critical infrastructure domain where decisionmaking is increasingly complex. The results of 3 LLM models are compared with traditional manual SLR results to assess capability, reliability and effectiveness. Our findings highlight LLMs as a novel tool in decision science and operations management for criteria identification, introducing an AI-enabled Decision Support System. The main contributions of this approach are: 1) Enhancing accuracy by systematically identifying decision criteria, 2) Handling multidisciplinary complexity by extracting insights across diverse documents, 3) Saving time and resources by reducing the need for full-article manual reviews. Future research will extend this methodology to other critical domains. We aim to develop a standardized criteria catalog for Critical Infrastructures (CIs) using this technology, create a smart data model, and contribute to global collaborative initiatives led by FIWARE Foundation, TM Forum, IUDX, and OASC. Our next step will focus on prompt engineering for optimized criteria selection.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
AIDI Final.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Pre-print non referato (Non-refereed preprint)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
400.01 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
400.01 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


