It is necessary to wait for the most recent developments of embodied cognition to give empirical evidence to the bodily involvement of the agent in the theory of action. The construct of the “sense of agency” provides new elements to overcome the vision of an agency theorized in the absence of bodily mechanisms of sensory processing and motor control. It provides a direct knowledge of our actions based neither on observation nor inference and can be implemented in a computational model of the agent. What is more, robotics studies fit into this picture because by investigating what happens at the neural level when we add an extension to the agent's body gives the possibility to modulate and correlate the knowledge related to the phenomenological experience with the knowledge related to the neural level. To combine a theoretical approach with a radical approach that relies on the construction of complete intelligent systems with a real apparatus of perception and movement that interacts with the environment is able to avoid misleading results. This approach presents strong evidence that the sense of agency originates in the neural processes responsible for the motor aspects of action. I will discuss how these recent results are compatible with a causal theory of action. My aim is to contribute to a compatibilist perspective able of integrating the knowledge stemming from different approaches to the same phenomenon. Giving scientific consideration to the body does not necessarily mean surrendering to naturalism; it implies not being entangled in an alleged tension between two cultures.
Embodied cognition, teoria causale dell’azione e sense of agency
Fiorella Battaglia
2021-01-01
Abstract
It is necessary to wait for the most recent developments of embodied cognition to give empirical evidence to the bodily involvement of the agent in the theory of action. The construct of the “sense of agency” provides new elements to overcome the vision of an agency theorized in the absence of bodily mechanisms of sensory processing and motor control. It provides a direct knowledge of our actions based neither on observation nor inference and can be implemented in a computational model of the agent. What is more, robotics studies fit into this picture because by investigating what happens at the neural level when we add an extension to the agent's body gives the possibility to modulate and correlate the knowledge related to the phenomenological experience with the knowledge related to the neural level. To combine a theoretical approach with a radical approach that relies on the construction of complete intelligent systems with a real apparatus of perception and movement that interacts with the environment is able to avoid misleading results. This approach presents strong evidence that the sense of agency originates in the neural processes responsible for the motor aspects of action. I will discuss how these recent results are compatible with a causal theory of action. My aim is to contribute to a compatibilist perspective able of integrating the knowledge stemming from different approaches to the same phenomenon. Giving scientific consideration to the body does not necessarily mean surrendering to naturalism; it implies not being entangled in an alleged tension between two cultures.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
BattagliaTeoriaREV.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Licenza:
Non specificato
Dimensione
1.23 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.23 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Battaglia_Teoria.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Licenza:
Non specificato
Dimensione
197.51 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
197.51 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.